Sunday, January 24, 2016

OSHA

OSHA is an acronym for Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA was created by the Department of Labor in 1970 by passing of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. OSHA has many standards that have been created and passed by the Administration. These rules follow a broad category of areas, such as: construction work, Agriculture, Maritime operations, and General Industry. These standards keep the employees safe by making various rules and regulations that the employers must follow to protect their employees from hazards. These standards cover various aspects of hazards, such as: electrical safety, confined space, fire safety, noise, forklift and other heavy machinery handling, work surfaces, machine guarding, biosafety, welding, cutting, brazing, trenching and shoring, excavations, and fall protection.
These standards are in place to make sure a work site is in compliance with the current safety regulations and to prevent any future injuries or patterns of workplace carelessness with increased training. If a work site is not in compliance, they will be given a written report on all of the areas that are in violation after the OSHA inspector has looked at the work site completely. They will also be issued fees for having violations in some cases, which will increase if they have not been fixed by the set date. Many of these standards are in place to prevent injuries: either from adding protection, informing the workers on the proper personal protective equipment to use for a certain task, or to reduce the risk of the workers by making physical barriers.
Any hazard that is not under a specific OSHA standard would lie under the General Duty Clause 5A, which states that employers are required to supply a workplace that is free from all recognized hazards. An example of this would be if there was glass on the ground, it is a dangerous hazard to anyone walking in that path. OSHA is extremely important because many of these standards are not common knowledge to the workers at the company so they could be exposed to many more hazards then they are fully aware of. The inspectors that go around to companies are few in number but they are vital to many companies increases their safety practices and decreasing the amount of serious injuries.

OSHA 1910 also covers laboratory safety standards. These standards are non-mandatory for companies to follow. These standards include occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in the lab, hazard communication, air contaminants, blood borne pathogens, lockout and tag out, and personal protective equipment. The standard lists specific levels of certain chemicals that require the use of PPE and the dangers associated with them. Hazcom insures that employers are providing their employees with the correct information, such as container labeling, training, and safety data sheets. Air contaminants list standards for how long and at what concentration a worker can be exposed. Blood borne pathogen section lists various microorganisms found commonly in human blood and how to prevent their spreading. Lock out tag out covers the maintenance of equipment and machines and is used when the sudden turning on of a machine could harm the employee.




Monday, January 11, 2016

Ethics

There are many different ways to define ethics, some say it is a person's morals and values, whereas others say it is a unwritten code of rules a person follows. Today I will be talking about the six levels of ethics: personal, professional, public, federal, corporate and state. Among these six levels there are smaller, more detailed inner levels. Take personal ethics for example, this has to deal with your family and friends. Professional ethics has to do with your job and the decisions you make in the workplace. Public ethics deal with your community. Federal ethics deal with ethics on the federal level.


Sometimes these different levels of ethics can rival one another. What you think is ethically right on a professional level may not agree with what you think is ethically right on a personal level. A person may bend the ethics to make an action seem correct because of a conflicting level. This was the case in the article "The Lawyer Who Became DuPont's Worst Nightmare." To the employees that have worked at DuPont for generations, this company is the lifeblood of the town. They are so loyal to this company that they have not reported health issues due to the exposure of PFOA that have had horrible side effects such as birth defects of their own children. If you were the employee to say something, then everyone else in the community would shun you and refuse to sell goods and services to you. Which level of ethics should you abide to? Is one level more important than another? This is a judgement call and more based on your personal beliefs. If it wasn’t for Rob Bilott the lawyer that took up a farmer’s case against DuPont than things would have went a lot differently. Bilott took up the case even though it was not under his normal cases for his job. Not only did he take up that case but he then took it even further and used his ethics on the public and the federal level to push further for the misuse and misreported of PFOA by DuPont. DuPont had hidden away the effects of PFOA for decades from the public, which violated just about every level of ethics. There is a cost for everyone to go against one of their levels of ethics, how much money would it take for you to go against your personal ethics? Five hundred dollars, or maybe 1,000 dollars? For the people in West Virginia is was around 500 dollars. 

In the end the public and the employees at DuPont safety can all be due to Bilott, we need more lawyers to be like him and stand up against huge corporations when they take advantage of the people living in the town with chemicals that are unsafe for people to be around 8 hours a day and to be exposed to in the drinking water, air, and soil all around them.



Resources:

"The Lawyer Who Became DuPont's Worst Nightmare" The New York Times
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/strat-ldr-dm/pt4ch15.html
http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/strategic-management-evaluation-and-execution/s14-02-corporate-ethics-and-social-re.html